返回

香港民研 2024 年終回顧:變化中可以抓緊甚麼?

HKPORI 2024 Year-end Review: What Can We Hold Onto Amidst Changes?

2024年,是香港民研離開大學、獨立運作的第五年。這一年,我們在推進香港民調的發展之外,更決定重新定位香港民研,著力回應社會議題, 並嘗試進行民調相關的公眾教育。

► 專題研究:用數據切入社會議題

這一年,香港民研進行了四次專題研究,分別就垃圾徵費、生育意願、照顧者支援政策、劏房管制進行不同形式的民意調查。這些專題由香港民研自主發起,旨在回應社會當前的討論。其中,10月份進行的生育意願專題是我們重新定位後的首個專題,由港人的生育考慮,帶出社交文化、房屋議題、教育制度的討論,希望在數據基礎上拓闊議題。

4月份進行的垃圾徵費民調,發現市民反對的是政策實施時間表;慎思民調更反映,市民經過理性討論後傾向支持垃圾徵費概念。於是,當政策推行失敗,就不應歸咎於市民對概念反感。

11月,香港民研又進行了照顧者支援政策慎思民調,顯示市民在了解政策及照顧者經驗後,傾向認為現行政策無效幫助照顧者。香港民研並以民調數據推算本港照顧者人口,從而推進有關照顧者定義的公共討論。

12月,回應政府提出的「簡樸房」政策,我們進行了有關劏房管制的民調,現正進行數據分析。敬請期待調查結果。

► 質性分析:解剖民意的複雜面向

今年1月,香港民研首次在網上意見群組調查加入開放式問題,了解市民支持/反對特首、對政府滿意/不滿意等的原因,然後透過「文字雲」(word cloud)的形式呈現答案中最常見的字眼。及至近期,香港民研就港府積極推動的盛事經濟,了解市民看法。開放式提問的答案顯示,市民對「夜繽紛」較有印象,但亦都有很多人表示對盛事沒有印象;而當市民描述印象時,最常見的字眼卻是「浪費」。

這一年間,研究員積極運用開放式題目取得的答案進行質性分析,受訪者不時會在答案中透露個人處境,部分市民甚至會以上百字回答,為量性調查的概括性答案提供民情脈絡,提醒民意不應被扁平處理。

► 公眾教育:建構理性討論的基礎

11月美國大選,四年一度的選舉再次令選舉民調備受關注。美國民調機構在上兩屆選舉低估特朗普選情,其後不斷進行技術調整,今次的封關民調顯示共和黨特朗普與民主黨賀錦麗的選情咬緊,最終卻由特朗普大勝。於是,民調是否再度失準再次成為討論焦點,但更重要的是我們應該怎樣理解民調數字、怎樣評估民調的可信度。藉著美國大選的契機,香港民研撰寫了兩篇「科普文章」,嘗試用淺白語言將民調知識、國際視野帶入公眾討論。來年,我們會積極推動民調科普,亦歡迎大眾向我們建議題目。

► 網站重整:搭建民調知識的平台

香港民研過去半年間一直進行網站重整,希望提供數據下載的便利,令民調數字能為大眾所用。另一方面,亦都為配合民調教育工作,以及即將推出的客席專欄,提供網上交流平台。在這個平台之上,我們設有會員專區,將會提供民調知識、數據分析、評論影片。網站終於在日前面世,現為公開測試階段,2025年1月將會正式啟用。

► 二〇二五見

香港民研在過去這一年作出了很多重大的嘗試,甚或說改變,這些決定無疑是為了回應不斷變化中的香港社會。在資源萎縮的情況下,我們選擇繼續進行有限度的自資民調,著力於讓人看見民調的社會價值。2024年,「變」的可能是民調頻率與形式,「不變」的是我們相信民調價值。2025年,希望大家繼續支持香港民研。

(香港民研編輯部)

轉載文章時請註明出處為「香港民意研究所」

2024 marks the fifth year since HKPORI became independent from the university. This year, beyond advancing public opinion research in Hong Kong, we decided to reposition ourselves, focusing on addressing social issues and developing public education related to opinion polling.

► Topical Studies: Using Data to Address Social Issues

In 2024, HKPORI conducted four topical studies, covering waste charging, fertility intentions, carer support policies, and subdivided units regulations. These studies, initiated by HKPORI, aimed to address ongoing societal discussions.

Our October study on fertility intentions was the first topical project following our repositioning. By examining Hongkongers’ considerations regarding childbirth, we sought to broaden the discussion to include social culture, housing issues, and the education system, all based on empirical data.

In April, our poll on waste charging revealed that public opposition was mainly due to the policy’s implementation timeline. Deliberative polling further suggested that after rational discussion, more citizens supported the concept of waste charging. Therefore, the policy’s failure should not be attributed to public rejection of the idea itself.

In November, we conducted another deliberative poll on carer support policies. The results indicated that after understanding the policies and carers’ experiences, more citizens found the current policies ineffective in assisting carers. Using polling data, HKPORI estimated the carer population in Hong Kong, sparking public discourse on the definition of carer.

In December, in response to the government’s proposed “basic housing units” policy, we launched a poll on subdivided units regulations. The data is currently being analysed, and we look forward to sharing the results soon.

► Qualitative Analysis: Unpacking the Complexity of Public Opinion

In January, for the first time, HKPORI introduced open-ended questions in our online panel survey. These questions explored the reasons behind citizens’ support or opposition to the Chief Executive, as well as their satisfaction or dissatisfaction with the government. The answers were visualised using word clouds to highlight the most frequently mentioned terms.

More recently, HKPORI examined public views on the government’s push for the “mega events economy”. Open-ended responses revealed that while citizens were most familiar with the “Night Vibes” initiative, many also expressed having no impression of the events. Among those who described their impressions, the most common term was “waste”.

Throughout the year, researchers actively conducted qualitative analyses of open-ended responses. Respondents often disclosed personal circumstances in their answers, with some providing detailed replies. These insights enriched the context of quantitative survey results, reminding us that public opinion should not be flattened.

► Public Education: Building the Foundation for Rational Discussion

The US presidential election in November once again brought election polling into the spotlight. After pollsters underestimated Trump’s performance in the last two elections, they made technical adjustments. This year’s final polls showed a close race between Republican Donald Trump and Democrat Kamala Harris, but Trump ultimately won by a landslide. This reignited debates about the accuracy of polling.

More importantly, it raised questions about how we should interpret polling data and evaluate its credibility. Taking this opportunity, HKPORI published two “popular science” articles, using plain language to introduce polling knowledge and international perspectives into public discussions. Looking ahead, we will actively promote polling literacy and welcome suggestions from the public on future topics.

► Website Revamp: Building a Platform for Polling Knowledge

Over the past few months, HKPORI has been revamping our website to facilitate data downloads, making polling results more accessible to the public. Additionally, the revamped website supports our public education efforts and will feature guest columns for more open discussions.

The platform includes a members-only section, offering content such as polling knowledge, data analysis, and commentary videos. The new website has officially entered its public testing phase and will be fully launched in January 2025.

► See You in 2025

Over the past year, HKPORI has made significant efforts and even changes in response to Hong Kong’s evolving society. Despite the shrinking resources, we chose to continue conducting self-funded polls on a limited basis, striving to highlight the social value of polling.

In 2024, what may have changed are the frequency and formats of our polls. What remained unchanged is our belief in the value of polling. We hope you will continue to support HKPORI in 2025.

When sharing article, please indicate the source as “Hong Kong Public Opinion Research Institute”

專業訂製研究服務

Professional Customized Research Services

香港民意研究所憑藉超過35年的經驗,專業提供服務,助您精準掌握社會動態,支持明智決策。

With over 35 years of experience, HKPORI is specialized in providing customized services to help ourcollaborators accurately grasp social dynamics and support informed decision-making.

數據收集
Data Collection
問卷設計
Questionnaire Design
數據處理與分析
Data Processing and Analysis
更多專業服務
Other Professional Services

支持我們

SUPPORT US

支持香港民意研究所的成功有賴民間社會志願參與研究、訂閲會藉和公民贊助我們
The success of HKPORI requires the support of our civil society in the forms of volunteerism, membership and sponsorship.